Transparency

Instructions for authors
lodging formal rebuttals to:

1. The disproof of Darwin's theory of Evolution
2. The disproof of Einstein's theory of Relativity

IT IS ADVISED YOU PLEASE READ THE TEXT THOROUGHLY
If you have not read the text, your rebuttal to disproof (1) is likely to be inadequate.
(Do not be fooled by the apparent simplicity of the points that have been raised here because although it may seem easy to the average person to try and refute it, you will be surprised at the difficulty in explaining the simplest aspects of change and also in explaining operators in equations.)

Terminology:

Lodged - refute has been received
Under review - Mr Vallejo is reviewing the refute
Invalidated - Author has agreed their refute cannot hold against arguments posed by the disproof and further discussion
In contention - Author and Mr Vallejo both hold that their arguments are correct and are open to public review at this website

Any successful rebuttal to either disproof will be formally acknowledged and Mr Vallejo's disproof retracted in a public statement.
The author of the first successful rebuttal to disproof (1) will receive prize money of $10,000AUD.

1. Refuting The disproof of
Darwin's Theory of Evolution:

You must: Provide an objective representation for a change.

  • Package your refute as a PDF
  • Please read the text well as you will be promptly referred to it for any simple issues that it has already explained
  • Please state your title in your email. Universities and professional institutions will have priority.
  • Bogus titles will be deleted immediately without review so please be honest about who you are
  • All refutes in contention will be posted with the author's and Mr Vallejo's final positions. Please use diagrams and simple language to explain yourself
  • Reference specific page numbers or sections of the text
  • Any refutes attempting to use assigned continuity as an argument will be immediately rejected
  • Any refutes arguing that the past present and future are all occurring at the same time will be immediately rejected
  • If your refute uses complex mathematical terms, explain why and provide a simplified translation as prose and diagram. (Before composing a refute involving copious amounts of mathematics and formulae, every operator in your equations must be accompanied by a formal explanation of exactly what process is involved to bring that operation into reality (i.e. explain how a +, -, *, = etc accomplishes its operation))
Some suggestions for authors attempting this formal rebuttal:

Any of the following will invalidate the disproof:

  • Foremost: Provide an objective representation for a change
  • Prove time is absolutely continuous (i.e. that it is not discrete)
  • Show how a time dependent function can acquire a discrete value from an absolutely continuous time line i.e. one with no points
  • Construct an absolutely continuous time line where the past present and future are separated
  • Acquire the left and/or right neighbour (as a value) of any value on the Real number line
  • Show the Real number line can be traversed point to point
  • Show the Real number line does not collapse if infinite subdivision completes
Mr Vallejo attests that all of the above are impossible to prove.

2. Refuting the disproof of
Einstein's Theory of Relativity:

You must: Provide a general representation (normal or slow) of the three clocks M, S and P in the slide show Disproving Relativity. One clock-face only per clock.

  • Package your refute as a PDF
  • Please state your title in your email. Universities and professional institutions will have priority.
  • Bogus titles will be deleted immediately without review so please be honest about who you are
  • All refutes in contention will be posted with the author's and Mr Vallejo's final positions. Please use diagrams and simple language to explain yourself
  • Reference specific page numbers or sections of the text
  • If your refute uses complex mathematical terms, explain why and provide a simplified translation as prose and diagram.

Public review process

All rebuttals in contention are available here for public viewing

Darwin's Theory of Evolution
0 Lodged
0 Under review
0 Invalidated
0 In contention
Disproof still stands

Einstein's Theory of Relativity
0 Lodged
0 Under review
0 Invalidated
0 In contention
Disproof still stands

Academic review

  1. The disproof is open to any level of academic review. Please obtain the disproof/text in conjunction with the more rigorous proof concerning Linear Continuity: Proving the Real Number Line is a conceptual continuum only 4pp Journal format (PDF)
  2. Mr Vallejo is prepared to discuss either disproof with any learned professional